1 of 1 928-WP.4227.2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 WRIT PETITION NO. 4227 OF 2020 ASHOK ANANDA PATIL THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY SANDEEP ASHOK PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. Bhausaheb S. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. D. R. Korde, AGP for Respondent-State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 27th MARCH 2026 P.C.:- 1. After hearing the learned Advocates for some time and considering the issue involved in the matter, it appears that the dispute pertains to questions of fact, which cannot be appropriately adjudicated in the present proceedings. 2. Mr. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, therefore, seeks liberty to approach the Civil Court by raising the same issues. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for appropriate reliefs. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef 2026:BHC-AUG:15717