902-FCA-26-2020 (+).odt {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4410 OF 2020 IN FCA/26/2020 Charushila @ Shailaja Bhimrao Jadhav VERSUS Bhimrao Tarakchand Jadhav WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 24 OF 2020 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4356 OF 2020 IN FCA/24/2020 Charushila @ Shailaja Bhimrao Jadhav VERSUS Bhimrao Tarakchand Jadhav ...... Mr. Manoj M. Kadtu, Advocate for the Appellant (absent) Mr. K.B. Kulkarni, Advocate for Respodnent ...... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 08 APRIL, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Learned Advocate for the appellant in both the matters is absent without assigning any reason once again. Earlier also, he remained absent on 29.01.2026. Thereafter, on 13.02.2026, on his request, accommodation was granted; however, he was again absent on 24.03.2026. 2026:BHC-AUG:15092-DB 902-FCA-26-2020 (+).odt {2} 2. By our order dated 24.03.2026, it was made clear that the said opportunity was the last chance and that if the learned Advocate for the appellant remained absent on the next date, the appeals are liable to be dismissed. 3. In view of the continued absence of the learned advocate for the appellant without assigning any reason, we dismiss both the appeals for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE S P Rane