905 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 905 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 354 OF 2020 Santosh Ravindra Panchal And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Abhijeet Choudhari for the Petitioners - Absent Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None appears for the petitioners. 2) The petitioners have themselves claimed that they are already granted approval for their appointment from non-aided to aided posts. However, the direction in this petition is for paying consequential benefits. 3) Since the petitioners have not prosecuted the petition, by the passage of time, they must have been paid the consequential benefits. 4) In view of the above, nothing survives in this petition, and it stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page|1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:38023-DB