SARITA SHUKLA AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/10071/2020 · 2026-09-08
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1566 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 10071 of 2020 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Case is called out. None appear for the petitioners to press this petition. It is listed in the category of "writs likely to have become infructuous (Efflux of time)". A notice is also placed in the cause list mentioning that "old cases up to the year 2022 shall be taken up in the first round itself. In case of non- appearance, matters shall be dismissed as infructuous or otherwise, and in the cases, where the cause of action still survives, the concerned advocates are expected to mark them accordingly in the cause list. Failures to do so, may result in its dismissal as infructuous" but, neither the counsel for the petitioners has appeared nor the case has been marked to indicate that the cause of action still survives. The matter is pending since the year 2020. It appears that either the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the matter or it has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous September 9, 2026 Junaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Agnihotri Kumar Tripathi, Taniya Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Sarita Shukla And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JUNAID AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad