ASHOK KUMAR MAURYA AND 6 OTHERS v. TEJ PRATAP SINGH YADAV, ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER
CAPL/1254/2020 · 2026-03-15
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 5 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1254 of 2020 Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Maurya And 6 Others Opposite Party :- Tej Pratap Singh Yadav, Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Shukla,Rashmi Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sunil Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. List has been revised. Counsel for the applicants is not present. Counsel for the opposite party is present. It appears that order of Writ Court has been complied with, therefore, counsel for the applicants is not present. In such view of the fact, contempt application is dismissed and is consigned to record. However, applicants are at liberty to file a recall application against the order of this Court, if they find that the order of Writ Court has not been complied with. Order Date :- 11.5.2022 Sattyarth Digitally signed by SATTYARTH ANAND Date: 2022.05.13 18:06:01 IST Reason: Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad