Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1202 (JHR)

SURESH PRASAD BURNWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2458/2020 · 2026-02-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.2458 of 2020 ------ Suresh Prasad Burnwal, aged about 50 years, son of Late Ramdeo Burnwal, resident of Ward No. 13, Dumka Road, Dhandhra, P.O.- Dhandhra, P.S. & District- Jamtara. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Pranati Banerjee, daughter of Late Jagannath Banerjee 3. Saikant @ Saikat Banerjee, son of Late Sailen Banerjee 4. Smt. Rina Banerjee, wife of Late Sailen Banerjee All are resident of Jamtara Bazar Road, Indira Chowk, P.O. and P.S.- Jamtara, District- Jamtara … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jayant Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, GA III ------ Order No:-08 Dated:-02-04-2026 Heard parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the judgment dated 16.02.2026 passed in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, because of printing error, the date of judgment has wrongly been mentioned as ‘16th February of 2025’ instead of correct date being ‘16th February of 2026.’ Considering the facts of the case, it is ordered that the date mentioned in the judgment dated 16.02.2026 passed in this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition be treated as ‘16th February of 2026’ instead of incorrect date being ‘16th February of 2025’ and this order be treated as the part of the judgment dated 16.02.2026. The judgment dated 16.02.2026 passed in this case is modified to the aforesaid extent only. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-02.04.2026-Animesh/