IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.4540 of 2020 Decided on: 15th June, 2026 Uploaded on: 15.06.2026 Pankaj Thakur ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr.Vikrant Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Hemant Kumar Verma, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening developments and efflux of time, he does not want to press the present petition. 2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 15th June, 2026 Judge (naveen) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?