IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3069 of 2020 Decided on :21.05.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Veena Singh & others ...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Vijay Kumar Arora, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Ms. Avantika Negi and Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwa Deep Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate for respondent No.3. None for respondent No.4. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that due to intervening development and efflux of time, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition, and as such the petition may be permitted to be withdrawn. 2. In view of the aforementioned statement, the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to raise the dispute in case need arises in future. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. 21 st May , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge