Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP No.3666 of 2020
Decided on: 22nd May, 2026
Joginder Kumar
....Petitioner
versus
H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd and others ...Respondents
Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioner: Mr.Bonit Prakash, Advocate vice Mr.A.K. Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr. Anil Kumar God, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr.Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.3.
Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral)
Learned vice counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening developments and efflux of time, he does not want to press the present petition.
2.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as not pressed. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 22nd May, 2026
Judge (naveen)
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?