ASSESSING OFFICER-CUM-ASST.ENGINEER v. DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM
WP(C)/8438/2019 · 2026-08-27
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Writ Petition (Civil)body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 874 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 874 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1 of 1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 8438 of 2019 CNR No.ODHC010237752019
Assessing Officer-cum-Asst. Engineer & Ors. ..... Petitioners Mr. B.K. Nayak 1, Adv. -versus- District Consumer Redressal Forum & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.V. Balkrishna, Adv. (for O.P. No.2)
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 27.08.2026
Order No. 04
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Even though the matter was listed under the heading ‘For Referral to Mediation’, but on the consent of the Parties, the matter was taken up.
3. Heard.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners contended that Petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to move the appropriate forum.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY)
Judge
Jyoti