Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2019 DAILYLAW 836 (ORI)

JAGANNATH PLASTIPACKS LTD. v. ORISSA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

WP(C)/6846/2019 · 2026-07-20

B P Routray

Writ Petition (Civil)body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.6846 of 2019 Jagannath Plastipacks Ltd., Shastri Nagar, Nayabazar, Cuttack …. Petitioner Mr. T. Mishra, Advocate -versus- Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation, Bhubaneswar and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P. Mohanty, Advocate for O.P. Nos.1 to 3 CORAM: JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 20.07.2026 Order No. 05. 1. Heard Mr. T. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. P. Mohanty, learned counsel for Opposite Parties 1 to 3. 2. The Petitioner has filed present writ petition with a prayer to quash the impugned demand made under Annexures-6, 9 & 11 in the event of transfer of the land in favour of the sister company of the Petitioner. 3. This Court vide order dated 19.06.2019 directed the Petitioner to deposit the demand amount before the IDCO, which shall be kept in fixed deposit bearing interest in any Bank. 4. Now, it is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner by filing an additional affidavit dated 07.07.2026 that, the Petitioner is no more interested for transfer of the land to the proposed sister company and thereby the prayer in the writ petition has rendered infructuous. Digitally Signed Signed by: BASANTA KUMAR BARIK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 20-Jul-2026 17:10:03 Signature Not Verified 5. As such, it is submitted by Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the demand amount deposited by him for the purpose of transfer pursuant to the order of this Court dated 19.06.2019. 6. Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel appearing for Opposite Parties 1 to 3 submits that they have no objection to such prayer of the Petitioner for withdrawing the prayer of the proposed transfer. However, for refund of the amount deposited by the Petitioner for the purpose may be considered by Opposite Parties 1 to 3. 7. Keeping in view the contentions of the Petitioner as per his additional affidavit dated 07.07.2026, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with further observation that the Petitioner may apply for refund of such amount deposited before the IDCO pursuant to the direction dated 19.06.2019 of this Court and in such event, the IDCO authority shall consider the prayer of the Petitioner as per law within a period of thirty days from the date of application. 8. An urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. ( B.P. Routray) Judge B.K. Barik