Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2019 DAILYLAW 813 (ORI)

JAGADA NANDA PANIGRAHI v. THE STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/27818/2019 · 2026-06-30

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 27818 of 2019 Jagada Nanda Panigrahi ..... Petitioner Mr. R. Sarangi, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha and Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA Mr. S. Mishra, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 30.06.2026 Order No. 04 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 3. In course of hearing, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners contended that Petitioner does not intend to press the Writ Petition with the prayer as made and only seeks liberty to move the Opp. Party-Corporation for consideration of his claim to get the benefit of regularization before Opp. Party No.2. 4. Learned Counsel appearing for the Opp. Party-Corporation though objected to such prayer made by the Petitioner, but this Court considering the submission, is inclined and permit the Petitioner to make an applications before Opp. Party No.2 for consideration of his claim to get the benefit of regularization. Page 2 of 2. 5. It is observed that if any such application is moved within a period of three (3) weeks hence, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a further period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such application. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti