Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 22449 of 2019 Anima Jena ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Baisakh, Advocate -versus- M/s. GRID Corporation of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Ms. S. Pattnaik, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 1) Ms. R.R. Jena, Advocate on behalf of Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 6) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 09.03.2026 Order No. 14 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Considering the nature of rejection available under Anneure-10, this Court is of the view that the issue cannot be decided by exercising the power conferred under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India. 4. However, it is open for the Petitioner to move the appropriate authority/court of law for redressal of the grievance as made in the writ petition. 5. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha