p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4058 of 2019 Supriya Goswami …. Petitioner Mr. H.N. Mohapatra, Advocate -versus- Abhisek Acharjee …. Opp. Party None CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 21.04.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 11. 1. The matter has been listed under the heading “For referral to the Special Mediation Drive 2.0- Mediation for the Nation”. 2. The matter was presented before this Court on 15.02.2019. 3. The challenge in the writ petition is to the order dated 17.01.2019 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri in I.A. No.10 of 2017 arising out of C.P. No.15 of 2017. The I.A. was filed under Section 36 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 seeking Rs.50,000/- towards pendente lite expenses and interim maintenance. The said application was rejected by impugned order dated 17.01.2019 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri. 4. Notices were issued by the coordinate Bench on 26.02.2019. Interim orders were passed directing stay of further proceeding in C.P. No.15 of 2017. Thereafter Digitally Signed Signed by: RAJESH KUMAR BADHEI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 30-Apr-2026 19:28:39 Signature Not Verified p. 2 interim order was passed on 09.04.2019, 30.04.2019 and 20.02.2020. On 28.02.2020 the matter was adjourned at the instance of the learned counsel for the opposite party. On 13.03.2020, the matter was adjourned by the petitioner. Thereafter after passage of six years, it was listed on 07.03.2026 under the heading ‘For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive 2.0- Mediation For The Nation’. 5. Pursuant to the order dated 31.03.2026, the Registry has intimated to the learned counsel for the petitioner, who is present, about the next date of listing of the matter. Pursuant to the order dated 31.03.2026, the Registry has also obtained the instruction vide letter dated 08.04.2026 from the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri regarding the present status of C.P. No.15 of 2017, which is kept in the record marked as flag ‘B’. The said letter discloses thus: “… Subsequently on dtd.07.04.2023 due to non-prosecution of the petitioner the CP Case No.15/2017 was dismissed for default.” 6. In view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication in the present application. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Rajesh/Sipra