HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2606/2019 CM No. 7987/2023 CM No. 1189/2021 Inhabitants of Village Pathgam .....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through :- None. v/s State and others .....Respondent(s) Through :- Ms. Pallvi Sharma, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R-1, 2, 4 and 5. Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-3. CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 10.09.2026 There was no representation on behalf of petitioner on the previous date of hearing. Same is the position today also. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also not filed the supplementary affidavit, in terms of order dated 07.03.2025, despite availing number of opportunities. It shows that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting this writ petition. The same is accordingly dismissed, along with connected applications, for want of prosecution. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 10.09.2026 Raj Kumar Sr. No. 11 Raj Kumar 2026.09.14 10:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document