ROMAL SINGH v. AJEET KUMAR SAHU SECY.P.H.E.DEPTT.AND ORS.
CCP(S)/432/2019 · 2026-09-07
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
Contempt Petitionbody2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 686 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 432/2019
202
Romal Singh
…..Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
Through: Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate.
q
vs
Ajeet Kumar & Ors. .….Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 07.09.2026
1. By way of the present contempt petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of the
judgment dated 03.11.2018, whereby the respondents were directed to pay to the petitioner such amount as was admittedly payable to him, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of the order was to be made available to them.
2. At this stage, learned counsel for the parties submit that the aforesaid
judgment dated 03.11.2018 has been complied with by the respondents in its letter and spirit.
3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt petition.
4. Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Notice, if any, stands discharged.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)
Judge
Jammu 07.09.2026 Abinash
97