ANJU JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA TH.MINISTRY OF DEFENCE AND ORS.
WP(C)/2231/2019 · 2026-09-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 685 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 685 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2231/2019 CM No. 4549/2019
Anju Jain
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Union of India & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (03.09.2026)
01. Record reveals that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested in prosecuting the present petition.
02. Accordingly, the writ petition, is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 03.09.2026 Renu
Serial No. 70