Sr. No. 63 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: CRM(M) No. 292/2019 CrlM No. 699/2019 CrlM No. 699/2021 Harjeet Singh …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- None V/s State of J&K …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG (Sr. Adv.) for R-1 to 3. None for R-4 and 5. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 21.07.2026 1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates of hearing and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The writ petiton is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 21.07.2026 Suraj K. Singh