Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2019 DAILYLAW 654 (JK)

AJIT SINGH v. AJIT KUMAR SAHU, SECRETARY P.H.E.DEPTT.AND ORS.

CCP(S)/540/2019 · 2026-07-21

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Contempt Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH Sr. No.65 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: CCP(S) No. 540/2019 in SWP No. 66/2012 CM No. 6523/2024 CM No. 2860/2026 Ajit Singh …. Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through:- None V/s Ajit Kumar Sahu, Secretary, PHE Deptt. & Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG (Sr. Adv.) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 21.07.2026 CM No. 2860/2026 1. The instant application has been filed by the applicants/respondents herein seeking extension of time to file objections with regard to release of interest component. 2. For the reasons set out in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit and in view of what has been argued, the same is allowed. Consequently, the time is extended by three weeks to comply with the order/judgment passed by the Writ Court In Totoinsofar as the interest component is concerned. 3. Application stands disposed of. CCP(S) No. 540/2019 4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly submits that the judgment passed by the learned Writ Court stands complied with insofar as the retiral benefits are concerned. However, she further submits that insofar HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH as the interest component is concerned, the same has not been released so far. 5. Since the respondents have already complied with the judgment insofar as the retiral benefits are concerned and only the judgment is required to be complied with to the extent of the interest component, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has assured the Court that the interest component will also be released within the extended time granted by this Court. 6. Thus, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep alive the instant contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is disposed of by directing the respondents to release the interest component in terms of the order/judgment passed by the learned Writ Court within the extended period of three weeks, positively. 7. Accordingly, the proceedings in the instant contempt petition are closed. Rules, if any, shall stand discharged. However, the petitioner shall be liberty to revive the contempt petition, in case, the interest component is not released within the stipulated time granted by this Court and in that eventuality the Court will be constrained to initiate coercive measures against the respondents. 8. Disposed of. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 21.07.2026 Suraj K. Singh