RAM PARKASH v. STATE OF J AND K TH.STATION HOUSE OFFICER
CRM(M)/396/2019 · 2026-07-20
Ma Chowdhary
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 649 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 649 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 396/2019 CrlM No. 945/2019
Ram Parkash
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (20.07.2026)
01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case on the last date of hearing, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further.
02. Petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith connected application(s).
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(M A CHOWDHARY) JUDGE JAMMU
20.07.2026
Bunty
Serial No. 43 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.07.20 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document