JAVED IQBAL v. SARITA CHOUHAN SECY. EDUCATION DEPTT. AND ORS.
CCP(S)/332/2019 · 2026-07-17
Rajnesh Oswal
Contempt Petitionbody2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 644 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 644 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CCP(S) No. 332/2019 In SWP No. 1545/2008
Javed Iqbal
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
Sarita Chouhan Secy. Education Department and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.07.2026
1. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last three dates of hearing. Same is the position today as well.
2. Compliance report has been filed. The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India has upheld the closure of the Scheme. Accordingly, the proceedings in the present contempt petition are closed with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy, if so available under law.
3.
Disposed of.
4.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 17.07.2026 Neha-II
Serial No. 19 NEHA KUMARI 2026.07.17 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document