OM PARKASH AND ORS. v. STATE TH. COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY UAD, CIVIL SECTT. AND ORS.
WP(C)/1684/2019 · 2026-07-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 642 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 642 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH ATJAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 1684/2019
Om Parkash & Ors. .....Petitioners
Through :- None
v/s State & Ors. .....Respondents
Through :- Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA for 1 & 5 Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R- 3 & 4 Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate for R-2
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.07.2026
1. The record reveals that when the matter was listed before the Division Bench on 15.03.2021, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. Even today, when the matter has been listed after a lapse of five years, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners, perhaps for a reason that with the efflux of time, the matter has been rendered infructuous or that the petitioners may not be interested in prosecuting the matter further.
2. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissedfor non- prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
JAMMU 17.07.2026 Sneha Sr. No. 04