Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2019 DAILYLAW 636 (UTT)

KAMAL MISHRA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/317/2019 · 2026-07-17

Siddhartha Sah

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010029232019 C482/317/2019 Kamal Mishra --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J. Mr. Vivek Sanguri, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, learned A.G.A. assisted by Mr. Manoj Bhatt, Advocate for the State. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant makes a statement that the matter has become infructuous. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present case is dismissed as infructuous. (Siddhartha Sah, J.) 17.07.2026 Nahid/Ravi