AMARDEEP SINGH BAL v. UNION OF INDIA TH. MIN. OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS.
SWP/458/2019 · 2026-05-08
Sanjeev Kumar
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 592 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 592 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 08 REGULAR LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
(Through Virtual Mode)
SWP 458/2019 AMARDEEP SINGH BAL …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE ORDE R 08.05.2026
1. On the last two dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was called out nobody turned up to appear on behalf of the petitioner. Otherwise also, having regard to the nature of the controversy involved this petition by afflux of time has been rendered infructous.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, subsisting shall stand vacated.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 08.05.2026
“MIR ARIF” MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 11.05.26