RAZAQ AHMED AND ORS. v. SHALEAN KABRA SECY.HOME DEPTT.AND ORS.
CPSW/150/2019 · 2026-05-15
Contempt Petitionbody2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 584 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 584 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU (THROUGH VIRTUAL MODE)
CJ Court Case: CPSW No. 150/2019 in SWP No. 2456/2018
Razaq Ahmed and ors. ….. Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs
Shaleen Kabra and ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 15.05.2026
1. By means of the present petition, the petitioners seek initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent-authorities for willful/deliberate defiance of order dated November 30, 2018, passed in SWP No. 2456/2018 (Razaq Ahmed and ors vs. State of J&K and ors.).
2. A bare reading of the order referred to above reveals that the petition preferred by the petitioners was disposed of by the Writ Court with a direction to the respondent-Authorities to accord
consideration to the claim of the petitioners within the stipulated time, strictly in accordance with the Rules.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents has shared a copy of the communication dated May 14, 2026, of Senior Superintendent of Police, Poonch (Respondent No.4) appended therewith the Parawise reply (Annexure- A). Copy whereof is retained on record, marked ‘X’. And, per the averments set out in paragraph No. 2, for, the petitioners did not fall in the merit list, owing to low merit, the candidature of the petitioners was not entertained and rejected.
Sr.No. 34
4. That being so, nothing substantive survives in the contempt petition and the same is, accordingly, disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
( (ARUN PALLI) CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu 15.05.2026 Sunita