SURINDER KUMAR v. CHENNAI NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
MA/46/2019 · 2026-03-11
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 557 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 557 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 15
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MA No. 46/2019
Surinder Kumar
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Dhreej Nanda, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
11.03.2026
1. The record reveals that the instant appeal has been pending before this Court since 2019 and there is a deliberate attempt on part of the appellant to protract the litigation on one pretext or the other. This aspect of the matter has already been observed by this Court vide
order dated 02.02.2026. Even adjournment was sought on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant on 02.02.2026, and the matter was adjourned with a rider that no further adjournment shall be granted on any count whatsoever on the next date of hearing.
2. Today when the matter was taken none has appeared on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the instant appeal.
3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CMs.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu: 11.03.2026 Javid Iqbal