INHABITANTS OF PANCHAYATS NAMELY MANGOTA A AND B v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH SECY PHE DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/4396/2019 · 2026-03-06
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 555 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 555 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 59
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 4396/2019
Inhabitant of Panchyat Namely, Mangota A .
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
UT of J&K and Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
06.03.2026
1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on last date of hearing i.e 05.02.2025. Same is the position today as well. It appears that petitioner has lost interest to prosecute the instant writ petition.
2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution along with connected CMs.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
4.
5.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu: 06.03.2026 Javid Iqbal