NARESH NISCHAL v. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH. COMMISSIONER-CUM-SCRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT
CRMC/29/2019 · 2026-02-27
Sanjay Parihar
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 550 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 550 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 30 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CRMC No. 29/2019 c/w APPCR No. 4/2019 in CrlM No. 21/2019
Naresh Nischal
…. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. R.K.S. Thakur, Advocate
V/s
State of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 27.02.2026
1. In this case, in terms of order dated 06.02.2026, the respondents were directed to place on record the latest status report regarding the complaint lodged by respondent No. 3 with the SHO, Police Station, Peer Mitha, Jammu on 26.06.2018, which was filed on
25.02.2025. From the status report, it transpires that the complainant had lodged a complaint before the SHO, Police Station, Peer Mitha, Jammu, but simultaneously appears to have also filed separate complaint before the Crime Branch, which the agency got enquired and found that the allegations were not proved and, accordingly, sent it for approval as not admitted, to the Crime Branch Headquarter, vide letter No. CHQ/Clt./J-101/2019/3172 dated 10.02.2022.
Page 2 of 2 CRMC No. 29/2019
c/w
APPCR No. 4/2019
2. Given the latest status report, it appears that the complaint lodged by respondent No. 3 has been found not proved and not trustworthy for further investigation.
3. In that background, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed.
4. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
( SANJAY PARIHAR )
JUDGE
JAMMU 27.02.2026 Nikhil