VIKAS SHARMA v. STATE OF J AND K TH. STATION HOUSE OFFICER
CRM(M)/480/2019 · 2026-02-27
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 547 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 547 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No.480/2019
Vikas Sharma
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
State of J&K .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 27.02.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last three consecutive dates of hearing i.e. 18.12.2020, 23.07.2021 and 12.12.2025 and same is the position even today as well. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s).
2. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
27.02.2026
Shammi
Sr. No. 71