MUMTAZ HUSSAIN SHAH v. SARITA CHAUHAN SECY.SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ANR.
CPSW/168/2019 · 2026-02-13
Sanjay Dhar
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 544 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 544 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CPSW No.168/2019 in SWP No.1718/2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No.168/2019 in
SWP No.1718/2009
Date of pronouncement : 13.02.2026
Uploaded on : 16.02.2026
Mumtaz Hussain Shah
….Petitioners
Through:- Mr. Nitin Bhasin, Advocate
V/s
Sarita Chauhan Secy., School Education Deptt., & Anr.
…..Respondents
Through:- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate
\
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
-
1. Through the medium of present petition, the petitioner is seeking implementation of order dated 08.03.2018 passed by the writ Court whereby the J&K Service Selection Board, respondents No.2 & 3 were directed to give an opportunity to the petitioner or his counsel to verify the record and thereafter decide the matter on its own merits in accordance with law. It has been further provided Serial No. 50 Regular List
CPSW No.168/2019 in SWP No.1718/2009
by the writ Court that if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can work out the remedy as per law.
2. Pursuant to the aforesaid directions of the writ Court, the respondents have passed order No.163- SSB of 2023 dated 28.08.2023 whereby and whereunder, it has been observed that the petitioner has been declared as ineligible because he was not having the requisite qualification for the post.
3. In view of the above, the directions of the writ Court stand complied with, as such, the contempt proceedings are, closed. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to assail the consideration order by taking re-course to appropriate legal remedy.
4.
Disposed of.
(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU
13.02.2026
Sneha
Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes/No Whether the judgment is reportable: Yes/No