Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2019 DAILYLAW 544 (JK)

MUMTAZ HUSSAIN SHAH v. SARITA CHAUHAN SECY.SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPTT.AND ANR.

CPSW/168/2019 · 2026-02-13

Sanjay Dhar

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CPSW No.168/2019 in SWP No.1718/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No.168/2019 in SWP No.1718/2009 Date of pronouncement : 13.02.2026 Uploaded on : 16.02.2026 Mumtaz Hussain Shah ….Petitioners Through:- Mr. Nitin Bhasin, Advocate V/s Sarita Chauhan Secy., School Education Deptt., & Anr. …..Respondents Through:- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate \ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE JUDGMENT (ORAL) - 1. Through the medium of present petition, the petitioner is seeking implementation of order dated 08.03.2018 passed by the writ Court whereby the J&K Service Selection Board, respondents No.2 & 3 were directed to give an opportunity to the petitioner or his counsel to verify the record and thereafter decide the matter on its own merits in accordance with law. It has been further provided Serial No. 50 Regular List CPSW No.168/2019 in SWP No.1718/2009 by the writ Court that if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he can work out the remedy as per law. 2. Pursuant to the aforesaid directions of the writ Court, the respondents have passed order No.163- SSB of 2023 dated 28.08.2023 whereby and whereunder, it has been observed that the petitioner has been declared as ineligible because he was not having the requisite qualification for the post. 3. In view of the above, the directions of the writ Court stand complied with, as such, the contempt proceedings are, closed. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to assail the consideration order by taking re-course to appropriate legal remedy. 4. Disposed of. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 13.02.2026 Sneha Whether the judgment is speaking: Yes/No Whether the judgment is reportable: Yes/No