Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 528 (AP)

M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,PRODDATUR v. MADDURI PULLAIAH

MACMA/240/2019 · 2026-06-17

T C D Sekhar

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010100322019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 240/2019 Between: 1. M/S NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,PRODDATUR, , REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, SAI RAM TOWERS, NAAGRAJUPETA, KADAPA TOWN AND CITY. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MADDURI PULLAIAH, , S/O. LATE CHINA GANGAIAH@ SANKARAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, PREVIOUSLY WORKING AS CLEANER.ARE RESIDING AT POLIMIDAYAPAILI HARIJANAWADA, DUMPALAGATTU POST, KHAJIPET MANDAL, NOW AT HIS RELATE VILLAGE, C/O. KONDURU SUDHAKAR, SUBBAIAH, UTUKUR HARIJANAWADA, UTUKUR POST, RAJAMPET MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. MADDURI MARIAMMA, , W/O. LATE CHINNA GANGAIAH @ SANKARAIAH, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, AGED 42 YEARS, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND MOTHER TO 1ST PETITIONER.,ARE RESIDING AT POLIMIDAYAPAILI HARIJANAWADA, DUMPALAGATTU POST, KHAJIPET MANDAL, NOW AT HIS RELATE VILLAGE, C/O. KONDURU SUDHAKAR, SUBBAIAH, UTUKUR HARIJANAWADA, UTUKUR POST, RAJAMPET MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. DURGAM MA HAMMED KHASIM, S/O. YERRANNA, 2 MUSLIM, AGE 37 YEARS, LORRY BEARING NO. AP 04 T 1719 PRESENT OWNER, RESIDING AT VINAYAKA NAGAR, YERRAGUNTLA. NOW AT C/O. S. MAHAMMED, S/O. SULEMAN, MUSLIM, D. NO. 48/511, R.V. NAGAR, KADAPA TOWN AND CITY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court Memorandum of Appeal against the order passed in O.P. No. 228 of 2013 dated 23rd October, 2018, on the file of M.A.C. Tribunal cum III Additional District Judge, Rajampet, Kadapa District. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 48 days in preferring the appeal against the orders passed in M.V.O.P.No.228/2013, dated 23.10.2018 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal III Addl. District Judge, Rajampet. IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay of all further proceedings in M.V.O.P.No.228/2013, dated 23.10.2018 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal III Addl. District Judge, Rajampet., pending disposal of the appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 240 OF 2019 J U D G M E N T: The matter was listed on 11.12.2020, there was no representation for the appellant. Again, on 20.03.2021, there was no representation for the appellant. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. In the result, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 18.06.2026 Pmk 4 30 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR M.A.C.M.A.No.240 of 2019 18.06.2026 Pmk