Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 521 (AP)

Smt Kolli Rani, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16344/2019 · 2026-06-14

V Sujatha

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010343782019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 16344/2019 Between: 1. SMT KOLLI RANI,, W/O SRINIVASA RAO, HINDU AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCCU- CULTIVATION, R/O SUREPALLI VILLAGE, MUSUNURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM 3. THE SUB COLLECTOR, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MUSUNURU MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. THE GRAM PANCHAYATH, SUREPALLI VILLAGE, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MUSUNURU MANDAL, KRISHNA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from her land adm Ac 2.00 cents in RS No 292/5, Ac 0.76 cents in RS No 292/4 i.e., a total extent of 2 VS,J W.P.No.16344 of 2019 Ac 2.76 cents situated in Surepalli Village Musunuru Mandal Krishna District without following due process of law i.e., without paying fair compensation amount as contemplated as per the provisions of the Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition Rehabilitation And Resettlement- Act 2013 as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and violation of Article 14 and Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess t ae petitioner from her land without following due process of law in the interest of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from her land adm Ac 2.00 cents in RS No 292/5, Ac 0.76 cents in RS No 292/4 i.e., a total extent of Ac 2.76 cents situated in Surepalli Village Musunuru Mandal Krishna District without following due process of law in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim orders dated 23.10.2019 passed in WP. No. 16344/2019 and dismiss the writ petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.16344 of 2019 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.Sk.Hussain, learned counsel representing Mr.Ch.B.R.P.Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that no further cause survives in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 15.06.2026 KGR