Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 507 (AP)

NAGAMANI v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2730/2019 · 2026-04-05

Sumathi Jagadam

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010059752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2730/2019 Between: 1. NAGAMANI, W/O. LATE SUBRAMANYAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. RAMAKUPPARN VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. N.THUSALI, W/O. SRINATHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC.HOUSE WIFE, R/O. 90, BANDARLAPALLI, RAMAKUPPARN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. C.RAMADEVI, W/O. C.S.PRATHAP REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. MOHAMMED ASIF, S/O.ABDUL KUDHEESH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, 0CC LABOUR, R/O.RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. ABDUL WAHID, S/O. LATE M.REHMAN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 0CC. LABOUR, R/O. MOSQUE STREE, RAMAKUPPARN VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER/SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. KESAVA REDDY, S/O.KRISHNA REDDY, MITTAPALLI VILLAGE, RAMAKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. B V MURAII KRISHNA, S/O.A.VISWANATHA SETTY, NEW BUS STAND ROAD, RAMAKUPPAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Wirt of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 not to entertain the any registration pending disposal of the suit OS No.6/2018 including vide document No. 290/2019, Dt. 23.01.2019 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice consequently direct the respondents to stay of all further proceedings in Sy.No. 117/3 and Sy.No.577 situated at 90 Bandarlapalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District forthwith, IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Sy.No. 117/3 and Sy.No.577 situated at 90 Bandarlapalli Village, Ramakuppam Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PRAKASH C Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P HEMACHANDRA 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 06.04.2026 rsd 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 2730/2019 Date: 06.04.2026 rsd