Smt.Gadde Krishna Lavanya, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/14116/2019 · 2026-04-06
Sumathi Jagadam
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 493 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 493 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010304312019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2693] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14116/2019 Between:
1. SMT.GADDE KRISHNA LAVANYA,, W/O.VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.42-211-25, DEVI NAGAR,
VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE THASILDHAR, BAPULAPADU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 4th respondent in attempting to dispossess from the petitioner's agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.0.67 cents in Sy.No.416-16, Ac.0.64 cents in Sy.No.416-3, Ac.0.78 cents in Sy.No.416-5, Ac.0.75 cents in Sy.No.416-9 and Ac.0.57 in Sy.No.416-4 totaling an extent of Ac.3.41 cents
2
of Remalle Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District as opposed to Law, arbitrary, unjust, malafide, against the Principles of Natural Justice and against the constitutional guarantees and to consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess from the petitioner's subject lands in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly the 4th respondent not to interfere with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the agricultural lands admeasuring Ac.0.67 cents in Sy.No.416-16, Ac.0.64 cents in Sy.No.416-3, Ac.0.78 cents in Sy.No.416-5, Ac.0.75 cents in Sy.No.416-9 and Ac.0.57 in Sy.No.416-4 totaling an extent of Ac.3.41 cents of Remalle Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District in any manner including dispossession in the interest of justice during the pendency of this writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, shall stands vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 07.04.2026 rsd
4
11 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 14116/2019
Date: 07.04.2026 rsd