Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 487 (AP)

Ganji Kanthamma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/18685/2019 · 2026-04-14

Sumathi Jagadam

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010379972019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18685/2019 Between: 1. GANJI KANTHAMMA,, LATE RAJARATHNAM,AGED 50 YEARS,COOLIE,R/O D.NO.1- 69,ALLAPURAM VILLAGE,GASNNAVARAM MANDALA KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT,MACHILIPATNAM,KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE TAHASILDAR, GANNAVARAMMANDALAM,KRSIHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue cultivation pattas in the name of petitioner by considering the representations dated 22-10-2019 and 28-4-2008, 18-12-2008,to agriculture land in R.S.No. 100 to an extent of 60.0 cents in allapuram village,Gannavaram Mandalam. Krishna Dt. and by directing the 3rd respondent to stop conducting survey for allotment of house sites by restraing from dispossessing the petitioner in any means and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 2 JS, J W.P.No.18685/2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim order by restraining the 3rd respondent from dispossessing the petitioner from the agricultural land in R.S No 100 to an extent of Ac0-60 cents to conduct survey for the proposed house sites pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 JS, J W.P.No.18685/2019 The Court made the following ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending writ petition, the respondents have passed orders on representations made by the petitioner. In view of the same, no further orders are required and requested to close the writ petition. In view of the submissions made, since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 15.04.2026 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.18685/2019 42 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18685/2019 Date: 15.04.2026 rsd