APHC010316232019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2601] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14806/2019 Between: 1. VEPOKOMMA RAJESWARAMMA,, W/O K.RAJA RAO, AGED 69 YEARS, VAKADU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. VEPOKAMMA PRABHAVATHAMMA,, W/O LATE GOPAL RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, KALLURUPALLI HOUSING BOARD, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. VEPOKAMMA SUBBARATHNAMMA,, W/O V.SUDHAKAR RAO, AGED 65 YEARS,SATRAM STREET, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. VEPOKAMMA HARI BABU,, S/O LATE V.SUDHAKAR RAO, AGED 34 YEARS, SATRAM STREET, GUDUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE 3. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDUR. SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT 4. THE THASILDHAR, SAIDAPURAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.. 2 5. JOINT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT 6. ASST DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. ANJANI TILES PVT LTD, CO. PUNNAPPAVARI PALEM CHILAKUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or direction more particularly in the nature of a writ of Mandamus under article 226 of the Constitution of India declaring the action of the 3rdrespondent in not disposing of the appeal RCB2 No. 1193/2019 filed by the petitioners against the orders of the 4threspondent in RCB 465/2007, dated 29-06-2007 as illegal, arbitrary against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rdrespondent to dispose of the appeal preferred against the orders of the 4threspondent dated 29.06.2007 expeditiously and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the order of the 4th respondentin RCB 465/2007, dated 29-06-2007 pending disposal of appeal RCB2 No. 1193/2019 before the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C SUBODH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. N SHOBA 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 07.04.2026 rsd 4 7 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14806/2019 Date: 07.04.2026 rsd