Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 483 (AP)

Gurram Venkateswara Rao, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

WP/17175/2019 · 2026-04-07

Sumathi Jagadam

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010360502019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17175/2019 Between: 1. GURRAM VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCCU CULTIVATION, R/O FLAT NO 303, KOLLI TOWERS, OLD BUSTAND CENTRE, TIRUVURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT FOR WOMEN, CHILDREN, DISABLED AND SENIOR CITIZENS(DW) AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUB COLLECTOR NUZVID AND PRESIDING OFFICER OF THE TRIBUNAL UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF MAINTENANCE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUVURU MANDAI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TIRUVURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. GURRAM NARAYANA, S/O LATE NARASAIAH, HINDU AGED 73 YEARS, OCCU- PROPERTIES, R/O NEAR DEGREE COLLEGE, OLD TIRUVURUVILLAGE TIRUVURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. GURRAM SUMATHI, W/O NARAYANA, HINDU AGED 65 YEARS, OCCU- HOUSE WIFE, R/O NEAR DEGREE COLLEGE, OLD 2 TIRUVURU VILLAGE TIRUVURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. GURRAM NARASIMHA RAO, S/O NARAYANA, HINDU AGED 44 YEARS, OCCU- TWO WHEELER MECHANIC D.NO 8-63, MUSUKULLA ROAD, YADAVA BAZAR, TIRUVURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the impugned orders dated 24-09-2019 in D.Dc.I/1086/2019 issued by 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Article 14 of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders dated 24-09- 2019 in D.Dc.I/1086/2019 issued by 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) 4. SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.Sk.Sardam Hussain, learned counsel, representing CH.B.R.P.Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 08.04.2026 rsd 4 35 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17175/2019 Date: 08.04.2026 rsd