Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 478 (AP)

Katragadda Raghupathi Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/21369/2019 · 2026-04-07

Sumathi Jagadam

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010444322019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21369/2019 Between: 1. KATRAGADDA RAGHUPATHI RAO, S/O RAMANADHAM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O 6-27, KOPPOLU, ONGOLE - 523 286 PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, , PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE 3. TAHSILDAR, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. MANDAL SURVEYOR, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. 6. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND SHO, TALUK POLICE STATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 7. CHENNAREDDY RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O CHANDRASEKHARA RAO AGED. 46 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O 1ST FLOOR, SARADA NILAYAM APARTMENTS, BESIDE SBI, MOTHINAGAR, HYDERABAD 2 8. CHENNAREDDY CHANDRASEKHARA RAO, S/O SREERAMULU AGED. 54 YEARS, OCC. GOVT. SERVICE,R/O 1ST FLOOR, SARADA NILAYAM APARTMENTS, BESIDE SBI, MOTHINAGAR, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondents particularly respondents 3, 4 and 6, at the instance of respondent Nos. 7 and 8, in insisting the petitioner to appear before their authority, yield and settle to the terms of 7th respondent, and vacate from his Agricultural Dry Land property of Ac 4.87 Cents comprising three pieces of Ac 2.89 Cents, Ac 1.18 Cents_and Ac 0.80 Cents respectively covered by Sy. Nos. 17, 565, and 413/1 and house site of Ac 0.06 Cents covered by Sy. No. 397, 398/2 of Koppolu Revenue Village, within Ongole Municipal Corporation, Ongole Mandai, Prakasam District, as illegal, irregular, irrational, without any authority of law and violative of articles 14, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's personal life, liberty and properties IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents particularly respondents No. 3, 4 and 6 not to interfere in any manner with petitioner's personal life, liberty and possession over his Agricultural Dry Landed property of Ac 4.87 Cents comprising three pieces of Ac 2.89 Cents, Ac 1.18 Cents and Ac 0.80 Cents respectively covered by Sy. Nos. 17, 565, and 413/1 and house site of Ac 0.06 Cents covered by Sy. No. 397, 398/2 of Koppolu Revenue Village, within Ongole Municipal Corporation, Ongole Mandal, Prakasam District, pending disposal of main writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant leave to file counter affidavit on behalf of respondents 7 and 8 in W.P. No. 21369 of 2019 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 3 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. ASHOK RAM V 3. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 4. NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY 4 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.7 and 8, and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. Learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy, learned counsel for the unofficial respondent Nos.7 and 8, submits that pending Writ Petition, respondent No.7 has filed O.S.No.49 of 2022 on the file of the Court of VII Additional District Judge, Ongole, for partition. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner and the unofficial respondents to work out their remedies before the trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 08.04.2026 RSD 5 256 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 21369/2019 Dated: 08.04.2026 RSD