APHC010355392019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2692] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16957/2019 Between: 1. SHAIK IMAM SAHEB,, S/O. LATE KHASIM SAHEB, AGED 77 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, 2. SHAIK LAL SAHEB,, S/O. LATE KHASIM SAHEB, AGED 70 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, 3. SHAIK NOOR SAHEB @ NOOR AHMED,, S/O. LATE KHASIM SAHEB, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, ALL ARE R/O. VEDANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JANGAREDDYGUDEM CIRCLE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOYYALAGUDEM POLICE STATION, KOYYALAGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 6. DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 7. SUBDIVISIONAL MAGISTRATECUMSUBCOLLECTOR, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATECUMTAHSILDAR, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 9. PODUDOLU NARAYYA, S/O. LATE GARATAYYA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, 10. PODUDOLU YESU YESAYYA, S/0. LATE GARATAYYA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-33, 11. DOKKA PANDU, S/O. VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-23, 12. KUNAPAM PENTAYYA, S/O. SURAYYA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-18, 13. KUNAPAM GANGARAJU, S/O. SURAYYA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-19, 14. KATRU VEJIKATESU, S/O. LATE ANKALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-43, 15. KALAPALA SREENU, S/O. GANGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-2/1, 16. DEVARAPALLI PEDA RAMAYYA, S/O. LATE GOPAYYA, AGED ABCUT 65 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-13, 17. PENNADA YESURAJU RAJU, S/O. LATE TATAYYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-27, 18. SHEIK SANDANI, S/O. LATE DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-35, RESPONDENT NOS. 9 TO 18 ARE RESIDENTS OF VEDANTHAPURAM VILLAGE, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 3 pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction on the part of respondents 2 to 8 on petitioners' representation dated 11.09.2019 submitted fc r initiating proceedings under Chapter VIII, Section 107 of Criminal Procedure C ode, 1973 against the respondents 9 to 18 for their illegal acts, thereby causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at petitioners' landed property admeasuring Ac.27.78 cents covered by Survey No. 174 of Vedanthapuram Revenue Village in Koyyalagudem Mandal of West Godavari District, as illegal, irregular, irrational and amounts to non discharge of legal obligation conferred on respondents 2 to 8 under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents particularly the respondents 4, 5 and 8 to initiate proceedings under Chapter- VIII, Section 107 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against respondents 9 to 18 and their henchmen for their illegal acts for causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at petitioners' said landed property IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 8 to consider and initiate necessary legal action on petitioners' representation dated 11.09.2019 submitted for initiating proceedings under Chapter-VIII, Section 107 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the respondents 9 to 18 and their henchmen for causing breach of peace and disturbance to public tranquility at petitioners' landed property admeasuring Ac.27.78 cents covered by Survey No. 174 of Vedanthapura -n Revenue Village in Koyyalagudem Mandal of West Godavari District, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SARATH KUMAR D Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 4 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri.P.Rishyendra Sai, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 07.04.2026 rsd 5 6 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16957/2019 Date: 07.04.2026 rsd