Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 453 (AP)

KODUMURU SARASWATHI v. VALE NAGAMMA

CRP/3492/2019 · 2026-04-22

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010389102019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3492/2019 Between: 1. KODUMURU SARASWATHI, W/O NAGAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O H. NO. 4, SHAROF BAZAAR, KURNOOL. 2. KODUMURU VARALAKSHMI,, W/O NAGAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O H. NO. 4, SHAROF BAZAAR, KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. VALE NAGAMMA, DIED 2. MANDLEM VEERAMMA ALIAS ERAMMA, (DIED BY L.RS) 3. V KALAVATHAMMA, W/O V. ESWARPPA, HINDU, HOUSE WIFE, R/O H. NO. 3-317, BIRMAL STREET, NANDYAL. 4. M ERANNA, DIED BY L.RS R6 TO R9). 5. A BHAGYAMMA, (DIED, HER L.RS R1 AND R2 ARE ALREADY ON RECORD) (RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDERS OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT BY IT'S ORDERS DATED 20.03.2006) 6. SMT BHAGYAMMA, W/O LATE M. VEERANNA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O 71/69, KALLUR VILLAGE, 2 KURNOOL DISTRICT. 7. M NAGAPPA, S/O LATE M. VEERANNA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O R/O 71/69, KALLUR VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 8. M NAVEEN, S/O LATE M. VEERANNA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O 71/69, KALLUR VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 9. SMT INDIRA, W/O NAGESWARAPPA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O 14-109-A, KUMMARI STREET, KODUNIUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. (R6 TO R9 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDERS IN I. A. NO. 339/2017 DATED 09.11.2017). 10. K SATYAMMA, W/O K. VENKATARAMANACHARI, , AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O H. NO. 76/97, PLOT NOS. 20 AND 21, NEAR RADIO STATION, ELKURI BUNGALOW, KURNOOL TOWN. (R10 IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDERS IN I. A. IVO. 1531/2012 DATED 30.11.2017) 11. Y RAMBABU, S / O LATE SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDENTS OF H. NO. 19/24, ELKURU ESTATE, NADIKOTKUR ROAD, KURNOOL. 12. Y RUKMINAMMA, W/O 11. RAMBABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HOUS WIFE,RESIDENTS OF H. NO. 19/24, ELKURU ESTATE, NADIKOTKUR ROAD, KURNOOL. 13. Y R PRASANTH BABU, S/O Y . RAMBABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, BUSINESS, RESIDENTS OF H. NO. 19/24, ELKURU ESTATE, NADIKOTKUR ROAD, KURNOOL. 14. J KAVITHA, W/O Y. R. PRASANTH BABU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE. ARE RESIDENTS OF H. NO. 19/24, ELKURU ESTATE, NADIKOTKUR ROAD, KURNOOL. (R11 TO R14 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE ORDERS IN I. A. NO. 1369/2012 DATED 30.11.2017) 15. A HMADI BEGUM, W/O SHUJAUDDIN AHMED, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O .TLAT NO. 503, DATTASAI RESIDENCY, OPP TO ST. JOSEPH DEGREE COLLEGE, KURNOOL. 3 16. MD SHANAWAZ, S/O .ATE M. A. JALEEL, MUS .IM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RETD. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE, NOW RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 503, DATTASAI RESIDENCY, OPP. TO ST. JOSEPH DEGREE COLLEGE, KURNOOL. (R 15 AND 16 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER ORDERS IN I. A. NO. 130/2019 DATED 26.04.2019) 17. SMT S NAGENDRAMMA, W/O S. NAGARAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O D. NO. 45/115B, NARASIMHA REDDY NAGAR, KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to the docket order dated 13.09.2019 passed in I.A. No. 959/2012 in O.s. No. 33/1988 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to SUSPEND the operation of the Docket order dated 13.09.2019 passed in 1. A. No. 959/2012 in 0. S. No. 33/1988 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool pending the above CRP before this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. SREEDHAR VALIVETI The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3492 of 2019 ORDER:- This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, challenging the orders dated 13.09.2019 in I.A.No.959 of 2012 in O.S.No.33 of 1988 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kurnool. 2. Sri W.V.B. Sravan, learned counsel representing Sri P.Rajasekhar, counsel for the petitioners, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, he seeks permission to withdraw the instant Civil Revision Petition. 3. Accordingly, recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 23.04.2026 RMR 5 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3492 of 2019 23.04.2026 W RMR