APHC010245862019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 916/2019 Between: 1. CHIDIPI VEERAAJU, S/O. BHARATHUDU, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O.3- 16, CHINAKONDEPUDI VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. CHIDIPI NAKULA SURESH, , S/O.ABBULU, AGED 29 YEARS, R/O.3- 32, CHINAKONDEPUDI VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PADAM RAM PRASAD, S/O NAGESWARA RAO, SECRETARY, PANDALAPAKA VILLAGE, BIKKAVOLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. CHIDIPI BANGARAIAH, , S/O. SUDARSHANAM, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. CHIANKONDEPUDI VILLAGE, SEETHANAGARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the contemnors No.1 for their wilful disobedience of the order dated 15-03-2019 passed in I.A.No.1/2019 the writ petition No.3538/2019 under section 10 and 12 of contempt of courts Act by duly summoning the contemnor and punish them according to law and be pleased to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 73 days in representing the contempt case and be pleased to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G R SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI 2. K.V.S.S.PRABHAKARA RAO The Court made the following order: Heard Sri R.Lakshmikar, learned counsel representing Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The above contempt case was filed complaining about the violation of the interim order dated 15.03.2019 in W.P.No.3538 of 2019. 3. At the hearing, Sri R.Lakshmikar, learned counsel representing Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners, would submit that W.P.No.3538 of 2019 was disposed of on 10.12.2025 and would contend that the interim order has merged with the final order. 4. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the contempt case is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 09.04.2026 SNI 139 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO:916/2019 Date: 09.04.2026 SNI