APHC010319522019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14939/2019 Between: 1. K.SUBBAMMA,, W/O CHINNASINGARAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, RIO APPARAJUPETA VILLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT., ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. TAHSILDAR, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly Respondent No.2 in interfering and obstructing the agriculture activity on the subject land of Ac.1.50 in Sy.No.475 A/3 of Rajupalem village, Badvel mandal, YSR Kadapa district witlqut issuing any notice and without passing any order as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and high handed, mala fide and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 not to interfere and obstruct the agriculture activity under taken by the petitioner on the subject land of Ac.1.50 in Sy.No.475 A/3 of Rajupalem Badvel mandal, YSR Kadapa district and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to 2 direct the Respondent No. 2 not to interfere and obstruct the agriculture activity under taken by the petitioner on the subject land of Ac.1.50 in Sy.No.475 A/3 of Rajupalem village, Badvel mandal, YSR Kadapa district, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 15.04.2026 rsd 4 31 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14939/2019 Date: 15.04.2026 rsd