Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 423 (AP)

P RAVI KUMAR v. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD

WP/7783/2019 · 2026-04-19

Battu Devanand

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010180062019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7783/2019 Between: 1. P RAVI KUMAR, S/O SATHYA RAMANAIDU, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC FARMER, R/O PEDA GOGULAPALLI VILLAGE, C.S. PURAM MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD, (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENTERPRISES) REGD. OFFICE B-9, QUTUB INSTITUTIONAL AREA, KATWARIA SARAI, NEW DELHI - 110 016. 2. THE DEPUTY MANAGER C A O, POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED, A.P., KANIGIRI CIRCLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, M.G.R. APARTMENT, NEAR POST OFFICE, KANIGIRI TOWN AND MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not granting compensation for the petitioner's affected dry land admeasuring Ac.1.37 Cents in S.No.422-4, situated Peda Gogulapalli Village, C.S. Puram Mandal, Prakasam District including Eucalyptus Plantation as biased, illegal and void and consequently direct the respondents to grant compensation to the petitioner for the aforesaid land including Eucalyptus Plantation without further delay to meet the ends of justice 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reconsider and dispose of the Representation dated 23-10-2018 of the petitioner within two (3) weeks to settle his calm of compensation in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to list the above WP.No.7783 of 2019 for expedite hearing through video virtual Courts due to urgency mentioned affidavit in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TENEPALLI NIRANJAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO.7783 OF 2019 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous. 2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND Dated: 20.04.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 7783 of 2019 Dated: 20.04.2026 TM