Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 4205 (PNJ)

PUSHPA SHARMA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CR/125/2019 · 2026-09-03

Jagmohan Bansal

Special Leave Petitionbody2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

230 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CR-125-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Pushpa Sharma ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Chirag Kundu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Yadav, DAG, Haryana. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition is seeking modification of order dated 05.10.2018 whereby learned Additional District Judge, Yamunanagar in execution application has granted compensation as assessed by Reference Court instead of as assessed by this Court in RFA No.5083 of 2009. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that Executing Court was supposed to grant compensation at par with co-sharers who have been granted compensation as per order dated 05.03.2014 passed in RFA No.5083 of 2009. The petitioner being co-sharer as per judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in ‘Ramphal & others v. Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & others’, 2026(1) RCR (Civil) 792, was entitled to compensation as paid to others. PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.09.07 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-125-2019 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned State counsel submits that State has filed SLP against order dated 05.03.2014 passed by this Court. 4. Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 18.09.2015 has dismissed SLP filed against order dated 05.03.2014 of this Court, thus, order of this Court has attained finality. The petitioner is entitled to compensation at par with co-sharers. Accordingly, the respondents are hereby directed to release compensation at par with co-sharers. It is made clear that petitioner would not be entitled to interest more than paid to co- sharers. The needful would be done within three months from today. 5. Allowed in above terms. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 03.09.2026 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2026.09.07 16:54 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document