IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 252 CR-8042-2019 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 Ekam Singh ...Petitioner Versus Lal Singh and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Pardeep Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral) 1. The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assailing orders dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure P-5) and 01.07.2019 (Annexure P-6), passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Rupnagar, whereby the application filed by the plaintiff- petitioner seeking amendment of plaint has been dismissed and evidence of the plaintiff has been closed by order of the Court, respectively. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned orders dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure P-5) and 01.07.2019 (Annexure P-6) are interim orders, and during the pendency of the present revision petition, the main suit from which the instant revision petition arises, has been disposed of vide judgment and decree dated 06.03.2023. It is further submitted that the impugned orders dated 25.11.2019 (Annexure P-5) and 01.07.2019 (Annexure P-6) have since merged in the aforesaid judgment and decree and in view thereof, the present revision petition has HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.07 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CR-8042-2019 (2) been rendered infructuous. He, thus, prays that the instant petition be disposed of, as such. 3. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. ( VIKAS SURI ) September 03, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.09.07 19:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment