Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 4186 (PNJ)

SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE v. SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANOTHER

CWP/34405/2019 · 2026-08-27

Kirti Singh

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 241 M/S SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE EMPLOYEES AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. Talwant Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jashandeep Singh, Advocate and Mr. Raj Kumar Selwan, Advocate and Mr. Naresh Kalra, Advocate and Mr. Joydeep Gar for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) The present petition was filed for setting aside the award dated 25.02.2019, whereby the Labour Court held the lay illegal, on the ground that the petitioner relevant provisions requiring prior statutory permission for lay 2. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been amicably settled betw Faridabad, regarding the settlement has been received. Learned counsel for both the parties state that they have no objection to the settlement and shall abide by the terms thereof. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-34405-2019 DATE OF DECISION: SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE Versus SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE EMPLOYEES AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Talwant Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jashandeep Singh, Advocate and Mr. Raj Kumar Selwan, Advocate and Mr. Naresh Kalra, Advocate and Mr. Joydeep Garg, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. KIRTI SINGH, J. (ORAL) The present petition was filed for setting aside the award dated 25.02.2019, whereby the Labour Court held the lay illegal, on the ground that the petitioner-establishment was not covered by the relevant provisions requiring prior statutory permission for lay Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties. The report of the learned Mediator, Faridabad, regarding the settlement has been received. Learned counsel for both the parties state that they have no objection to the settlement and shall abide by the terms thereof. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2019 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION: 27.08.2026 SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE AND ANR. … Petitioner (s) SUNFLAG HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE EMPLOYEES UNION ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Mr. Talwant Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jashandeep Singh, Advocate and Mr. Raj Kumar Selwan, Advocate and Mr. Jagjot Singh, Advocate for respondent No.1. The present petition was filed for setting aside the award dated 25.02.2019, whereby the Labour Court held the lay-off by the petitioner to be establishment was not covered by the relevant provisions requiring prior statutory permission for lay-off. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been een the parties. The report of the learned Mediator, Faridabad, regarding the settlement has been received. Learned counsel for both the parties state that they have no objection to the settlement and shall abide by … Petitioner (s) UNION ... Respondent(s) The present petition was filed for setting aside the award dated petitioner to be establishment was not covered by the Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter has been een the parties. The report of the learned Mediator, Faridabad, regarding the settlement has been received. Learned counsel for both the parties state that they have no objection to the settlement and shall abide by SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.08.27 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-34405-2019 (O&M) -2- 3. In view of the aforesaid settlement arrived at, the challenge to the impugned award dated 25.02.2019 (Annexure P-1) is disposed of in the terms so agreed upon between the parties. The parties shall not raise further claims or demands against each other arising from the impugned award dated 25.02.2019 (Annexure P-1) nor shall they raise any further claim or cause of action arising therefrom. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of the settlement arrived at between them. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the abovesaid terms. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (KIRTI SINGH) JUDGE 27.08.2026 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2026.08.27 18:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document