Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2019 DAILYLAW 418 (AP)

Mittadoddi Satyanarayana, v. Guduri Veerabhadra Rao,

CRLRC/1159/2019 · 2026-04-19

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010361562019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1159/2019 Between: 1. MITTADODDI SATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATE RANGA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 134, SECTOR - 8, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. 2. MITTADODDI NAGA LAKSHMI,, W/O SATHYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 134, SECTOR - 8, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GUDURI VEERABHADRA RAO, S/O SUBRAMANYA SASTRY, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT D. NO. 2-25-1/3, SECTOR-VI, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM-17. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATHI ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, aggrieved by the order dated.25-09-2019 of the Special Magistrate Court-VI at Visakhapatnam in CrI.M.P.No.7380/2019 in CC.No.283/2016 by allowing the petition filed by the petitioner/complainant under section 311 Cr.P.C., to receive his Income Tax returns for the assessment year 2012-13 2 and 2013-14 to prove his financial capacity on file to enable him to get mark those documents on his behalf IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all the proceedings in CC.No.283/2016 on the file of the special Magistrate court VI at Visakhapatnam. till pending final disposal of the main revision Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M V V R SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1159/2019 JUDGMENT: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.V.V.R.Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that, the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 2. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.04.2026. UPS 4 38 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1159/2019 Dt.20.04.2026 UPS