Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2019 DAILYLAW 4154 (PNJ)

NARESH KUMAR v. PUNJAB STATE BUS STAND MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND OTHERS

CWP/26970/2019 · 2026-07-27

Pankaj Jain

body2019

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-26970-2019, CWP-25794-2019 & CWP-29453-2019 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 248 Date of decision : 27.07.2026 1. CWP-26970-2019 Naresh Kumar ...... Petitioner versus Punjab State Bus Stand Management Company (PUNBUS) and others ...... Respondents 2. CWP-25794-2019 Anil Kumar ...... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents 3. CWP-29453-2019 Anil Kumar ...... Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Harpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Manmeet Singh Rana, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP-26970-2019 for respondents No. 3 and 4 in CWP-25794-2019 Mr. Rajinder Yadav, Advocate for Mr. Ajay Singla, Advocate for respondent No.3 in CWP-26970-2019 for respondent No.7 in CWP-25794-2019 and for respondent No.6 in CWP-29453-2019 **** DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26970-2019, CWP-25794-2019 & CWP-29453-2019 2 PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner(s) prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Liberty is granted to the petitioners to pursue their remedies against detention of their material by the respondents. 2. Mr. Sharma submits that the representation was already submitted to the Commissioner and to the Deputy Commissioner. This Court is sanguine that the authorities shall pass an appropriate order on the same, in accordance with law within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. The Collector shall also decide upon the issue of retention of rent paid by the petitioners during the pendency of the eviction proceedings. 3. Consequently, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of other connected cases. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE 27.07.2026 Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2026.07.30 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document