VIKAS ROHILLA v. KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA
CWP/24595/2019 · 2026-07-28
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2019
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 4146 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2019 DAILYLAW 4146 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-24595-2019 (O&M) Date of decision: 28.07.2026 Vikas Rohilla ....Petitioner Versus Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra ....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Lekh Raj Nandal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate for respondent.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR J. (Oral) Prayer in this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the post of Clerk (Budgeted) in pursuance to the Advertisement No.01/2019 dated 03.03.2019 in the BCA Category and further to direct the respondent to appoint the petitioner on the basis of his merit secured by him in terms of the criteria adopted by the respondent in all the four phases.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is unable to breach the threshold of the cut-off marks. As such, nothing survives for adjudication in the present petition and he seeks permission to withdraw the same. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) 28.07.2026
JUDGE yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MOHD YAKUB 2026.07.28 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.