CHANDIGARH 111 CWP No.26555 of 2019 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 TEJ PARTAP SINGH VIRK AND OTHERS …Petitioners Versus PUNJAB AND SIND BANK …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- None for the petitioners. Mr. R. Kartikeya, Advocate for the respondent. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J . (Oral) 1. On 05.05.2025, this Court passed the following order:- “Counsel representing the petitioners is informed to have passed-away. Registry is directed to issue notice to the petitioners so as to make alternative arrangement. List on 22.09.2025.” 2. Today, as per report of Registry, notices issued to petitioner Nos.1, 3 and 4 have been received back unserved with the report, “no such person of this name reside at given address.” Notice issued to petitioner No.2 has been received back unserved with the report, “house locked since long time”. 3. In view of the same, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for non-prosecution. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. POONAM RANI 2026.07.28 12:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.26555 of 2019 -2- 5. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioners to get the present petition revived, if any cause of action survives. 6. All pending Misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 27.07.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) P.Seth JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No POONAM RANI 2026.07.28 12:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document